What happened to the good old days of science? Well they are back! Full contact in your face science!
Consensus science is powder puff football. Dumbing down so no scientist is left behind. Real science is Australian rules football! Get your nose bloody, take your licks and try to give back better.
Today's scientist mistake the subtlety of the centuries old confrontations. When Angstrom told Arrhenius he was wrong, "Sorry, old boy. You appear to have miscalculated." In today's terms that is equivalent to, "You twit! What planet are you from! Heh, Auburn grad!"
You think a ponderer of his destiny as a member of the master race would take that lying down? No! If he had got the goods on Angstrom he would have been right dead in is face with, "Perhaps you should review your experiment again." Instead, Arrhenius sulked for a decade before grudgingly conceding, "Yes, warming would not be as much." The media was all over Svante "Arrhenius admits error, but does not provide his results!" It was years later before he cried uncle with, "1.6 (2.3) with water vapor."
That's the problem with these master race wimps. Arrhenius should have grown a pair and lashed back at Knut, "I may be off, but so are you!" A classic scientific feign to restore some honor. Then science would have advanced.
That is how it is supposed to work, in your face science! Like Dessler and Spencer. Get dirty and kick some data!
Efficient alternate energy portable fuels are required to end our dependence on fossil fuels. Hydrogen holds the most promise in that reguard. Exploring the paths open for meeting the goal of energy independence is the object of this blog. Hopefully you will find it interesting and informative.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2011
(190)
-
▼
October
(46)
- Simple Versus Too Simple
- New Blog For Easier Navigation
- Carbon Dioxide- A Not so Well Mixed Gas
- Another Shot at Explaining the Atmospheric Effect
- Phonon Versus Photon Research List
- The Relativity Series Begins Under Cosmic Puzzles
- Atmospheric Phonons - RHC and the Greenhouse Effect
- What the Heck is Effective Emissivity?
- Sci-Fi and the Tropopause Heat Sink
- Could Atmospheric Conductivity Help Regulate Antar...
- The Relative Motion of Low Energy Photons in a Mi...
- What is a Pyrometer Measuring When You Aim it at t...
- I am Still Getting Flack over the Value of Down We...
- What is The 4C Thermal Boundary?
- The Mysterious Case of the Missing Heat
- Orphan Photons? Are They Dark Energy?
- A Little Help Please. Global Average Surface Pres...
- Determing How Wrong I May Be
- Relativistic Conduction of Heat
- What is the Gain of the CO2 Control Knob?
- Science as a Contact Sport
- A Point I Missed Explaining Very Well- The Tropopause
- Why The Estimates were Off and Why I am Moving On.
- Using the Greenhouse Effect Triangles
- Dark Energy and our Not Accelerating Expanding Uni...
- Explaining why Einstien, Angstrom, Plank, Stefan-B...
- Now, to Truly Prove I am a Whack Job
- IPCC Down Welling Radiation Violates the Law!
- Visualization
- Just For Fun
- How Ohms Law Relates to Atmospheric Physics
- While Energy is Fungible, the Work is Not
- Poisson! Poisson!
- Chaos Mathematical Description of the Earth System?
- Comparison of NASA and K&T
- Crackpot?
- Snake Oil Salesman or Simple Logic?
- A call for Mathematicians - The Greenhouse Effect,...
- A better Cartoon?
- Trenberth, Monckton and Lucia - Are They missing t...
- Back to Baking Bacon Bread
- Supplimental Issues for What's not Good
- So What's not to Like?
- Physical Principals for the Cartoon Sensitivity Ca...
- That Damn Cartoon and the Third Viscount of Puzzles
- It is Just a Cartoon!
-
▼
October
(46)
3 comments:
awesome blog, do you have twitter or facebook? i will bookmark this page thanks.
My site:
rachat de credit rachatdecredit.net
So, how often have you said to your opponents/detractors, "Not even wrong!"??
>:)
LOL Remember Brain Brawl? :)
Post a Comment