Before the exciting diversion of Fukushima, which I pronounce oddly, I was building on misunderstandings of other transportation fuel options. Natural gas makes perfectly good sense from a energy security perspective, but squat from a CO2 emission perspective.
Politically, the global warming issue is losing ground mainly because proponents suffer from the same lack of trust they toss around about individual governments. They seem to believe that one global government is a better option than a bunch of individual governments doing their own thing. Conspiracy theories are so 20th century. The realism is that a majority government by third world leaders is no better than a minority government lead by first world capitalists. Bribery, corruption and stupidity are not reduced by increasing the number of players. Gridlock is, so that may be the only advantage of one world government.
Infrastructure cost is for some odd reason, one of the political stumbling blocks for hydrogen. An initial basic hydrogen infrastructure is only about 2 billion. That is a fraction of the subsidies for wind and nuclear power which no one complains about too loudly. That basic infrastructure is enough to start making Fuel Cell Vehicles (FCV) economically viable. If you can't fill up on the road why buy one? The basic infrastructure would initially limit FCV use to the more densely populated ares, but everything has to start somewhere.
America has an advantage in leading the alternate transportation energy front. For whatever reason, the rest of the world covets our neat toys. Other countries bitch about our gas guzzling SUVs, but foreign sales have remained strong. As I have said before, FCV's will be big gas guzzling looking vehicles that happen to be efficient and "green". Damn the bad luck. Shouldn't we all drive Mini Coopers packed to the gills with kids to look like we care about the environment? Maybe doing something instead of appearing to, makes sense?
Anyway, is a road system full of "green" Hummers really that absurd?
Efficient alternate energy portable fuels are required to end our dependence on fossil fuels. Hydrogen holds the most promise in that reguard. Exploring the paths open for meeting the goal of energy independence is the object of this blog. Hopefully you will find it interesting and informative.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2011
(190)
-
▼
March
(36)
- The Maturing of Radiation Understanding
- The Uncertainty of the Impact of Radiation - Fukus...
- The Renewal of the Nuclear Debate
- Radiation Stuff - It is Maddening I Tell You!
- Odd Things About Natural and Background Radiation
- A Dollar a Watt?
- America - The Sudia Arabia of Trash
- Why Waste Heat?
- It is all in the Sales Pitch
- Energy Infrastructure
- Critical?
- Our Hydrogen Economy and Synfuels
- Future Energy Scenarios
- The Political Aspect of a Hydrogen Economy
- Time to get Back to the Fun Stuff!
- More Radiation Stuff From Japan
- More Main Stream Media Fun
- So How is the World Press Doing?
- More on Radiation Dosage
- A Renewed Interest in Pool-Type Reactors?
- Concerns for US Nuclear Power Post Fukushima
- What Nuclear Power Designs Should be in Our Future?
- The Fantastical World of The Hypothetical
- Japanese Nuclear Crisis - Radiation Impact
- The Japanese Nuclear Crisis
- How Great an Idea is Natural Gas Powered Vehicles?
- What Happened at the Japanese Nuclear Reactors?
- How to Overly Complicate a Simple Problem
- An Open Mind Doesn't Mean Letting Your Brains Leak...
- Matters of Scale
- Why are Engineers Often Skeptics of Climate Change?
- Climate Science Puzzle
- Predicting Future Climate - the Decade Version
- Ethics in Climate Science
- Lables - What's in a Name?
- The War of the Posers?
-
▼
March
(36)
No comments:
Post a Comment